jueves, 31 de enero de 2013

‘He’s very paranoid’

While Alabama hostage situation continues, neighbors describe gunman Jimmy Lee Dykes as a volatile loner.

hostage1n-1-web.jpgNegotiators continued to demand that Dykes surrender, but authorities say the situation remained ‘static’ Wednesday. He’s also suspected of shooting 66-year-old Charles Albert Poland Jr., a bus driver in Midland City, before taking a child as a hostage from the bus.


A tense standoff in Alabama continued into the early hours Thursday as authorities demanded the gunman surrender from his underground bunker and free a child hostage.
“Give up! You need to exit the shelter, put down any weapons you have and approach police!” a negotiator said to the suspect, identified as 65-year-old Jimmy Lee Dykes, who is believed to have killed a man Tuesday before kidnapping the 5-year-old boy.
New details have also emerged of Dykes, who is described by neighbors as “very paranoid,” anti-government and possibly a “Doomsday prepper.”


Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/news/crime/neighbors-describe-ala-gunman-volatile-loner-article-1.1251931#ixzz2JZN2qAje

miércoles, 30 de enero de 2013

Witnesses tangle over background checks at gun control hearing

Influential figures on both sides of the gun control debate tangled Wednesday over the effectiveness of background checks, with the husband of wounded former Rep. Gabrielle Giffords urging an overhaul and a top National Rifle Association official saying "homicidal maniacs" will skirt the system no matter what. 
NRA Executive Vice President Wayne LaPierre was the final witness to testify before the Senate Judiciary Committee as the panel begins to consider new legislation. He argued that more security and more enforcement, but not new laws, is the answer to gun violence. 
He specifically knocked down a call by President Obama and others for "universal" background checks, particularly at gun shows. 
"When it comes to background checks, let's be honest -- background checks will never be universal because criminals will never submit to them," LaPierre said. 
But Giffords' husband Mark Kelly argued that improving the background check system should be a priority. He said holes in the law "make a mockery" of the system -- echoing Obama's recent proposal, he called for submitting private sales to background checks as well. 


Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/01/30/nra-lapierre-to-tell-congress-more-gun-laws-not-serious-solution/#ixzz2JToTJZQd

martes, 29 de enero de 2013

Rubio blasts Obama for resistance to border security provision in immigration plan


Hours before President Obama is set to deliver a major immigration speech, a key Republican senator blasted the president for reportedly opposing a requirement to shore up border security before legalizing up to 11 million illegal immigrants. 
Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., one of four Republican senators involved in a bipartisan effort to craft immigration reform legislation, warned the president Tuesday against taking such a position. It was the first sign since the senators unveiled their guidelines a day earlier of friction between the two efforts. 
"I think that would be a terrible mistake," Rubio told Fox News. "We have a bipartisan group of senators that have agreed to that. For the president to try to move the goalposts on that specific requirement, as an example, does not bode well in terms of what his role's going to be in this or the outcome." 


Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/01/29/obama-presses-immigration-agenda-as-senators-draft-new-overhaul/#ixzz2JOB3itwt

lunes, 28 de enero de 2013

Bipartisan group of 8 senators reaches deal on immigration changes


A bipartisan group of eight senators plans to announce they have agreed on a set of principles for comprehensive immigration reform.
The deal, which will be announced at a news conference Monday afternoon, covers border security, guest workers and employer verification, as well as a path to citizenship for the 11 million illegal immigrants already in this country.
The eight senators expected to endorse the new principles are Democrats Charles Schumer of New York, Dick Durbin of Illinois, Robert Menendez of New Jersey and Michael Bennet of Colorado; and Republicans John McCain of Arizona, Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, Marco Rubio of Florida and Jeff Flake of Arizona.
According to documents released early Monday, the senators will call for accomplishing four main goals:
--Creating a path to citizenship for the estimated illegal immigrants already in the U.S., contingent upon securing the border and better tracking of people here on visas.
--Reforming the legal immigration system, including awarding green cards to immigrants who obtain advanced degrees in science, math, technology or engineering from an American university.
--Creating an effective employment verification system to ensure that employers do not hire illegal immigrants.
--Allowing more low-skill workers into the country and allowing employers to hire immigrants if they can demonstrate they couldn't recruit a U.S. citizen; and establishing an agricultural worker program.
The principles being released Monday are outlined on just over four pages, leaving plenty of details left to fill in.
A Senate aide tells Fox News the group's principles say important security triggers must be met before a pathway for citizenship is created for illegals. Even then, the principles explicitly state that illegals must go to the back of the line behind would-be legal immigrants, and they will not be eligible for federal benefits while in the temporary legal status. 
The aide tells Fox News that although many of the details of the bill still need to be worked out, those involved are encouraged by their progress and the support of senior senators. Members of the group on Sunday said they are seeking to craft a one-step, all-encompassing bill based on the shared principles. 
“We are committed to a comprehensive approach to immigration that we can live with,” Durbin told “Fox News Sunday.”
Citizenship has been a sticking point in previous efforts, particularly among Capitol Hill Republicans. However, they appear willing to accept the path to citizenship, in part, so long as the legislation also includes tighter border security.
Tennessee Republican Sen. Bob Corker told Fox he is optimistic but “details matter.”
“We’re at the talking points stage,” he said. “We need to get to the legislation.”
Arizona Republican Sen. John McCain, also part of the group, said more work is needed on the legislation.
“I’m quietly optimistic we can get it done,” he told ABC’s “This Week.”
McCain, a key player in the 2007 effort on immigration reform, also acknowledged that President Obama’s overwhelming support among Hispanics in the November elections was a wakeup call to Republicans that they need to do more to reach out to that growing part of the population.
The group has been working since the November elections on the legislation and is expected to have a complete bill by March or April.
Several of these lawmakers have worked for years on the issue. McCain collaborated with the late Democratic Sen. Edward M. Kennedy on comprehensive immigration legislation pushed by then-President George W. Bush in 2007, only to see it collapse in the Senate when it couldn't get enough GOP support.
Meanwhile, the president is scheduled to go to Las Vegas on Tuesday to talk about fixing “the broken immigration system this year,” according to the administration.


Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/01/28/bipartisan-group-8-senators-reach-deal-on-immigration-changes/#ixzz2JHiZHKsn

domingo, 27 de enero de 2013

Brazil Nightclub Fire Kills at Least 245


 SÃO PAULO—At least 245 people died in a fire that swept through a crowded nightclub in the southern Brazilian city of Santa Maria early Sunday, local television reports said.
The Globo television network reported that the fire broke out around 2 a.m. local time, when the Kiss nightclub was crowded with more than 1,000 revelers. Officials said the death toll could rise, prompting President Dilma Rousseff to cut short her attendance at a summit of Latin American and European leaders in Chile and fly home.
The cause of the fire was unclear. Globo quoted firefighters as saying the blaze apparently was caused by sparks from faulty sound-and-light equipment, although one eye witness said the band was using fireworks that could have triggered the fire.
Nightclubs in the region have suffered similar tragedies in recent years, partly because of weak safety supervision by local governments. A fire in a nightclub in Argentina in late 2004 killed 194 people when a pyrotechnic flare was set off and ignited foam in the ceiling. Materials used for decoration were found to be flammable, while some fire exits were chained shut. Safety inspectors came in for heavy criticism as the nightclub, Republica Cromanon, was overdue for a fire-hazard inspection. The incident also forced Buenos Aires Mayor Anibal Ibarra to resign.

viernes, 25 de enero de 2013

Icahn, Ackman in Epic Showdown of Billionaires


Call them the "Bickering Billionaires," two financial titans who squared off in a breathtaking, unforgettable smackdown Friday on CNBC.
Bill Ackman, the head of Pershing Square Capital Management and its $12 billion in assets, squared off against Carl Icahn, the fellow activist investor and one of the richest men in America with an estimated fortune of nearly $15 billion.
The debate revolved around charges and countercharges, with Icahn calling Ackman dishonest and "a major loser," while Ackman countered that Icahn is a bully "not used to someone standing up to him."
Traders at the New York Stock Exchange punctuated the air with "oohs" and "aahs" during the arguing, while social networks lit up, with financial journalists and market watchers tweeting and posting as fast as their fingers could type. (Read More:Ackman: Icahn Wanted to Be My Friend, I Said No)
The setting was during the final half-hour of CNBC's "Fast Money Halftime Report" with Scott Wapner, who found himself as much of the story as the two participants.
Icahn repeatedly berated Wapner. Icahn insisted he was the one being bullied and on several occasions used the word "bullsh--" to describe his feelings about the on-air forum.
"I've really sort of had it with this Ackman guy," Icahn said early on.
"Carl, you think I want to you invest with you?" Ackman charged later.
"I wouldn't invest with you if you were the last man on Earth!" Icahn bellowed in an exchange typical of the show's tenor.
At the core of the dispute was Icahn's furor with Ackman over the latter's short position on Herbalife, the nutritional supplement and dietary product company that Ackman has called a pyramid scheme. (Read MoreSelling the American Dream, a CNBC Investigation)
In turn, Ackman released a statement Thursday that recalled a legal dispute between the two parties 10 years ago that resulted in Icahn having to pay Ackman's investors $4.5 million plus interest.
Getty Images | CNBC composite
Carl Icahn (L), Bill Ackman (R)
While each combatant scored style points during the battle, if the winner was to be declared from the performance of Herbalife, Icahn scored a clear victory.
The company's shares surged as much as $2.15 in the half-hour melee, though gains cooled afterwards.
Some other zingers:
From Ackman: "I was concerned about dealing with Carl Icahn, because Carl Icahn unfortunately does not have a good reputation for being a handshake guy."
Icahn: "He's the quintessential example that on Wall Street, if you want a friend, get a dog."
Ackman, again: "What I can tell you is, this is not an honest guy, and this is not a guy who keeps his word. This is a guy who takes advantage of little people."
And the Icahn counter: "I appreciate Bill that you called me a great investor. I thank you for that. Unfortunately I can't say the same for you."
Indeed, it was great theater.
Twitter lit up, with participants frantically posting updates.
"Move over Snooki and The Situation.. here comes CNBC's version of "Jerry Springer With Limos" (Hat tip Sir Arthur!!)," investor Doug Kass tweeted.
CNBC's own Jim Cramer, host of "Fast Money," wondered, "Whatever happened to the dignity of wealth!??"
And financial news site Business Insider simply labeled it "The Greatest Moment In Financial TV History."

Cory Booker Rescues Dog From Cold In Newark


ABC 7 reporter Toni Yates saw two freezing pooches on a Newark street Thursday, astemperatures dipped into the teens.
Booker, perhaps the country's first Twitter politician, saw Yates' tweet, and went into action. Whether motivated by good publicity, or by the genuine desire to save a hapless pet, Booker showed up in time to pick up the canine, named Chacha.
(The second dog apparently had already been picked up by its owner.)
The mayor then tracked down the Chacha's owners, who didn't know she'd gotten outside.


Yates, naturally, was on the scene to capture Booker's heroics. And for extra cuteness, they filmed Chacha's adorable newborn puppies as well.

White House blasts recess appointments ruling


White House press secretary Jay Carney on Friday blasted a court decision that nixed three recess appointments to the National Labor Relations Board as “novel and unprecedented,” but said that he did not expect any broader application of the ruling.
“It’s one court, one case, one company,” Carney said.


Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2013/01/wh-blasts-recess-appointments-ruling-86737.html#ixzz2J1TjyyJr

jueves, 24 de enero de 2013

CEO Call: How Whole Foods Market Innovates in Employee Healt...

CEO Call: How Whole Foods Market Innovates in Employee Healt...: Providing employee health care has become a real challenge for businesses, especially in the United States, where costs keep rising inexo...

Feinstein proposes new ban on some assault weapons By Dana Bash and Tom Cohen, CNN

STORY HIGHLIGHTS
  • NEW: "These massacres don't seem to stop," Sen. Feinstein says
  • Assault weapons are displayed at the news conference
  • The proposals come almost six weeks after the Newtown school massacre
  • Strong opposition by the powerful gun lobby is expected
Washington (CNN) -- Almost six weeks after the Connecticut shooting rampage that killed 20 first-graders, Sen. Dianne Feinstein on Thursday proposed a new federal ban on some assault rifles and semi-automatic weapons, as well as ammunition magazines that hold more than 10 rounds.
With assault rifles and semi-automatic rifles displayed on one side and police officers who support her proposal behind her, Feinstein said the goal is to "dry up the supply of these weapons over time."
"These massacres don't seem to stop," the California Democrat said, listing notorious rampages of past years known by the lone name of their locations -- Columbine, Virginia Tech, Aurora, Tucson and Oak Creek.
"We should be outraged at how easy it is" for attackers to get hold of the semi-automatic weapons or large-capacity magazines used in those slaughters, Feinstein said.
The legislation, which would update a previous assault weapons ban that expired in 2004, is opposed by the nation's powerful gun lobby, led by the National Rifle Association.
Despite a push by the White House and Democrats for tougher gun control steps, Feinstein's full measure is given little chance of winning congressional approval.
Feinstein, who authored the 1994 Assault Weapons Ban that Congress declined to renew 10 years later, displayed weapons that would be banned, such as a Bushmaster automatic rifle, at Thursday's news conference.
Some are currently against the law in the District of Columbia, and Democratic sources told CNN the California Democrat coordinated with police on displaying the illegal weapons.
NBC's David Gregory was recently investigated for holding a banned ammunition magazine on the network's "Meet the Press" program broadcast from Washington. No charges were brought in that case.
President Barack Obama called for renewing the assault weapons ban as part of his package of gun control proposals announced earlier this month in response to the December 14 Newtown school massacre and overall gun violence in America.
Feinstein's measure would stop the sale, transfer, importation and manufacture of more than 100 specialty firearms and certain semi-automatic rifles, as well as limiting magazines to 10 rounds or less, she said. Not all of the weapons in the bill meet the technical definition of assault weapons.
The measure would not cover weapons already owned before it passed, as well as other hunting, sporting, antique, manually operated and disabled weapons, the senator said.
Those exemptions were an apparent effort to garner support for the measure from conservative Democrats and others expected to face fierce lobbying by the NRA and constituents.
Supporters of more gun control acknowledge the constitutional right to bear arms, but argue that rifles capable of firing multiple rounds automatically or semi-automatically exceed the reasonable needs of hunters and other gun enthusiasts.
They also contend that high-capacity ammunition magazines provide the capability for mass shootings such as the Newtown massacre.
Opponents contend the Second Amendment forbids the government from this type of limit on weapon ownership by citizens.
They worry that such a weakening of gun rights would signal a shift that would leave citizens defenseless against criminals and, some also argue, against potential future government tyranny or abuse. Instead, the NRA has called for increasing armed guards at schools to protect students.
Obama's proposals include expanding and strengthening background checks on gun buyers to ensure all sales include screening to prevent weapons from going to criminals and the mentally ill.
While the gun lobby has indicated support for some improvements in background checks, it remains opposed to other steps, saying they won't prevent criminals from getting weapons.
Instead, gun advocates urge tougher enforcement of existing laws and making criminals serve their full sentences.
Vice President Joe Biden led a panel assembled by Obama to examine gun control steps after the Newtown shootings, which sparked a fierce public debate over how to prevent such mass killings. Biden's recommendations formed the basis of the package of proposals Obama announced this month.
A recent CNN/Time Magazine/ORC International poll indicated that Americans generally favor stricter gun control, but they don't believe that stricter gun laws alone would reduce gun violence.
According to the survey, 55% of Americans generally favor stricter gun control laws, with 56% saying that it's currently too easy to buy guns in this country. However, only 39% say that stricter gun controls would reduce gun violence all by themselves.
In announcing his gun control package, Obama also signed executive actions that call for tougher enforcement of existing laws and require federal agencies to provide data for background checks.
A main focus of Obama's steps is closing loopholes in background checks. Across the country, more than a million people failed background checks to buy guns during the past 14 years because of criminal records, drug use or mental health issues, according to FBI figures. That figure, however, is a small fraction of overall gun sales.
Obama also called for more money to strengthen gun safety at schools, including hiring more counselors such as retired law enforcement officers to help educate students on gun issues. He also called for additional funding for communities to hire more police officers, but stopped short of seeking the NRA's proposal for armed guards at every school.
The CNN/Time/ORC poll showed respondents favored armed guards in schools, 54% to 45%.
New York state recently enacted a series of new gun regulations, the nation's first since the Newtown shootings. Ten other states are reviewing some form of related action.

North Korea says new nuclear test will be part of fight against U.S.

 By K.J. Kwon and Jethro Mullen, CNN
updated 11:07 AM EST, Thu January 24, 2013
North Korean leader Kim Jong Un, center, poses with chiefs of branch social security stations in this undated picture released by North Korea's official news agency on November 27, 2012. North Korea said Thursday that it plans to carry out a new nuclear test and more long-range rocket launches, all of which it said are a part of a new phase of confrontation with the United States. North Korean leader Kim Jong Un, center, poses with chiefs of branch social security stations in this undated picture released by North Korea's official news agency on November 27, 2012. North Korea said Thursday that it plans to carry out a new nuclear test and more long-range rocket launches, all of which it said are a part of a new phase of confrontation with the United States.
HIDE CAPTION
Kim Jong Un and his military
<<
<
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
>
>>
STORY HIGHLIGHTS
  • NEW: North Korea is upset by a recent U.N. security council resolution, an analyst says
  • Pyongyang says it plans a new nuclear test and further long-range rocket launches
  • These are part of an "all-out action" targeting the U.S., it says
  • North Korea has conducted two previous nuclear tests, in 2006 and 2009
Seoul, South Korea (CNN) -- North Korea said Thursday that it plans to carry out a new nuclear test and more long-range rocket launches, all of which it said are a part of a new phase of confrontation with the United States.
The North's National Defense Commission said the moves would feed into an "upcoming all-out action" that would target the United States, "the sworn enemy of the Korean people."
Carried by the state media, the comments are the latest defiant flourish from the reclusive North Korean regime, whose young leader Kim Jong Un has upheld his father's policy of pursuing a military deterrent and shrugging off international pressure.
The defense commission statement follows a United Nations Security Council resolution on Tuesday that the United States pushed for, condemning a recent recent rocket launch by North Korea and expanded existing sanctions.
North Korea threatens new nuclear test
North Korea move in 'defiance' of U.N.?
Richardson explains North Korea trip
Richardson, Google chief to N. Korea
The North's angry statement "should have been the expected outcome" from the U.N. decision, said Daniel Pinkston, senior analyst for the International Crisis Group covering Northeast Asia.
"I think they are completely outraged and insulted by it," he said.
North Korea, which often issues bellicose statements in its state media, said Thursday that it rejected all Security Council resolutions concerning it.
It described this week's resolution as "the most dangerous phase of the hostile policy toward the DPRK," using the abbreviated version of its official name, the Democratic People's Republic of Korea.
Analyst: Threat meant as a deterrence
The threats toward the United States, a constant theme in the North's propaganda, have more to do with deterrence than a desire for full conflict, Pinkston said.
"I don't believe they have the capability, the intention or the will to invade or destroy the United States," he said. "They wish to deter interference from the U.S. or any outside powers."
North Korea's successful rocket launch last month nonetheless changed the strategic calculations for the United States, showing that the North's missile program is advancing despite an array of heavy sanctions imposed on it.
Analysts say it still has a lot of work to do to master the technology necessary to mount a nuclear warhead on missile or accurately target it.
At the same time, Pyongyang has been hinting for a while that a new nuclear test could be in the cards.
Just before the North sent out its latest hostile statement Thursday, a U.S. State Department official was telling reporters in Seoul that Washington hoped that Pyongyang wouldn't go ahead.
"We think that that would be a mistake, obviously," said Glyn Davies, the U.S. special envoy on North Korea. "We call on North Korea, as does the entire international community, not to engage in any further provocations."
North Korea has carried out two previous nuclear tests, in 2006 and 2009, both of which were condemned by the U.N.
Pyongyang didn't say Thursday when exactly it would carry out a third test, but it could happen "at any time," according to Pinkston.
He said that it was hard for anybody outside the North Korean nuclear sector to know if the country is technically ready to carry out the test, but that politically, "it seems an appropriate time."
Demands unlikely to sway North
South Korean defense officials said last year that they believed the North had been in a position to carry out a new test whenever leaders in Pyongyang gave the green light.
North Korea's nuclear program is "an element of threat to peace not only for Northeast Asia but also for the world," Park Soo-jin, deputy spokeswoman for the South Korean Unification Ministry said Thursday.
"North Korea should immediately stop its nuclear test and other provocation and should choose a different path by cooperating with the international community," Park said.
That appears unlikely at this stage, though.
After a failed long-range rocket launch in April, North Korea ignored international condemnation and carried out a second attempt last month. That one succeeded in putting a satellite in orbit, Pyongyang's stated objective.
But the launch was widely considered to be a test of ballistic missile technology. And it remains unclear if the satellite, which the North insists is for peaceful purposes, is functional.
Both North Korea's previous nuclear tests took place weeks or months after long-range rocket launches.
Those tests were carried out under the rule Kim Jong Il, the father of the current leader, and the man who channeled huge amounts of money into North Korea's nuclear and missile development programs.
Kim Jong Il died in December 2011 after 17 years in power, during which the North Korean people became increasingly impoverished and malnourished.
Economically, the country relies heavily on trade with its major ally, China.

miércoles, 23 de enero de 2013

Apple may see earnings drop, but outlook is key Investors worry that iPhone 5 may already be running out of steam

SAN FRANCISCO (MarketWatch) — Apple Inc. may report its first quarterly earnings decline in nearly 10 years Wednesday afternoon, though investors’ attention is already fixated on the company’s outlook amid worries of a rapid slowdown in iPhone 5 demand.

Apple
Apple’s results and forecast on Wednesday afternoon may shed light on whether demand for the iPhone 5 has peaked.
The launch of so many new products — including the iPhone 5 and iPad mini — in the last part of the year is expected to weigh on profit margins for Apple’s first fiscal quarter, which ended in December.
Still, Apple is expected to post sales growth of 19%, thanks to holiday-fueled demand for those new devices.
But most attention will be fixed on Apple’s AAPL +1.09%  guidance for the March quarter, amid reports that the company is cutting back production of the iPhone 5 less than four months after its launch, suggesting demand may have already peaked.
“It’s all about the guide,” Gene Munster of Piper Jaffray told MarketWatch, speaking about the forecast for the March quarter.

AAPL 510.25, +5.48, +1.09%
800
700
600
500
400
A
S
O
N
13
It remained unclear how much weakness may already be baked into the stock, which has slid nearly 8% just this month and has shed more than one-quarter of its value since peaking above $700 in late September.
Steven Milunovich of UBS cut his price target on the stock to $650 from $700 — the shares ended Tuesday at $504.77 — but he added that “current levels are overly discounting the demand picture for Apple’s products, as well as future innovations and growth in new markets.”

Forecasts

For the December quarter, the company itself projected a 15% decline in earnings per share when it issued its last quarterly report, though analysts are modeling for a less drastic decline.
Apple is expected to report earnings of $13.47 per share, according to consensus estimates from FactSet, compared to earnings of $13.87 per share reported for the same period the previous year.
Revenue is expected to jump 19% to $54.9 billion, according to FactSet estimates.
The iPhone is still expected to drive the lion’s share of sales and earnings for the quarter. Apple is expected to ship approximately 48 million units of the iPhone in the December period, with some predicting that number could go higher than 50 million.

Why is RIM's stock on the move?

Research in Motion's stock is moving as anticipation grows for the January 30 launch of the BlackBerry 10 phone. Dan Gallagher joins digits.
Most analysts also expect between 22-23 million iPads to ship during the period, thanks to the launch of the iPad mini. Mac shipments are expected to total a little over 5 million units.
Questions about the health of the iPhone business will center on Apple’s forecast for the March quarter.
Analysts are currently predicting earnings of $11.77 per share for the current quarter — a decline of about 4% from the same period last year. Apple is known for guiding below Wall Street’s consensus targets, though analysts say if they go too low this time, they may confirm fears of an iPhone slowdown that could hurt the stock further.
“If they have a big miss for December but a phenomenal guide, the stock will go up,” Munster said. “But if they crush December but give a bad forecast, the stock is going to go down.”
Munster currently has a buy rating and $875 price target on Apple, though he has shifted some of his expected iPhone sales in the March quarter to the December period.

Clinton Defends Response to Benghazi Attacks

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton got into a heated exchange with Senator Ron Johnson (Rep., Wis) over whether or not the attack on the U.S. embassy in Benghazi was a 'protest' or 'terrorist attack.' Photo: Getty Images.
WASHINGTON—Secretary of State Hillary Clinton offered an unwavering defense Wednesday of the Obama administration's response to the 2012 assaults on U.S. government posts in Benghazi, Libya.
Mrs. Clinton again took responsibility for any security lapses in Benghazi but praised the response from her department and other government agencies.
She said the attacks "are part of a broader strategic challenge to the United States and our partners in North Africa" because of the emergence of violent extremism there.

'We Had Four Dead Americans'

"With all due respect, the fact is we had four dead Americans," Mrs. Clinton said, raising her voice and hammering her fist on the table. "Was it because of a protest or was it because of guys out for a walk one night who decided they'd go kill some Americans? What difference at this point does it make?" Read more about the exchange with Sen. Ron Johnson (R., Wis.) .
As she began her testimony, Mrs. Clinton became visibly emotional as she recalled meeting relatives of U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens and three other Americans who were killed in the Sept. 11 assault.
"I stood next to President Obama as the Marines carried those flag-draped caskets off the plane at Andrews [Air Force Base]," she told senators, choking back tears. "I put my arms around the mothers and fathers, sisters and brothers, sons and daughters."
Her appearance before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee had valedictory overtones, as she plans to step down once Sen. John Kerry (D., Mass.) has been confirmed as the new top diplomat.
"It has been one of the greatest honors of my life to lead the men and women of the State Department and USAID (U.S. Agency for International Development)," she said.
After listing a battery of government reactions to the Sept. 11 assault in Libya, she praised the work force of her agency.
"They ask what they can do for their country," she said.
Mrs. Clinton also is scheduled to testify before the House Foreign Affairs Committee about the Benghazi attacks.
That hearing, like its Senate counterpart, will be public.
The grueling day of testimony comes as Mrs. Clinton recovers from a month of health problems that began with a stomach virus and ended with her hospitalization for a blood clot near her brain. She has been back at work for two weeks, holding meetings, placing phone calls and making several abbreviated public appearances.
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton testifies that the hardest calls she had to make were to the families of U.S. ambassador Chris Stevens and Sean Smith, informing the families the men had been killed in Benghazi. Photo: Getty Images
State Department officials said Mrs. Clinton expected to face tough questioning from lawmakers, especially Republicans, who have assailed the Obama administration's missteps on the attacks.
Adding an extra note of potential political drama, the Senate panel includes a possible 2016 GOP presidential candidate, Sen. Marco Rubio of Florida. Mrs. Clinton, a Democrat, also is frequently mentioned as possible presidential contender.
GOP lawmakers have demanded to know what Mrs. Clinton did to improve security at the U.S. diplomatic post, and they maintain the administration attempted to deceive the public about the nature of the assault.
Soon after the assault, Mrs. Clinton took responsibility for inadequate security, but she has rebuffed questions from lawmakers until now, deflecting them for weeks while an investigation by an independent Accountability Review Board was under way.
That probe was completed last month and released while Mrs. Clinton was recuperating. It found that the State Department's response to the Benghazi attacks showed "systemic failures" in handling consular security.
The board faulted a "lack of proactive senior leadership" for security in Benghazi and said physical security was "profoundly weak."
Department officials accepted the board's findings and have agreed to enact all 29 recommendations in the report. The department dispatched teams of diplomatic and military officials to assess 19 high-threat posts and recommend security arrangements for each one.
A second investigation, by the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, formed the first bipartisan congressional report on the Obama administration's response to the Benghazi attacks.
The committee's report, issued Dec. 31, found that the State Department and Pentagon had no viable way to rescue Americans in Benghazi and the State Department had repeatedly failed to learn from past security breaches at embassies. The report spread the blame beyond State to include the Pentagon and the Obama administration.
Mrs. Clinton's appearance Wednesday followed dozens of public and closed-door sessions on Capitol Hill focused on the Sept. 11 assaults.
A confirmation hearing for Mr. Kerry will be held Thursday, before the same Senate committee that interviewed Mrs. Clinton.

Trump interested in buying the New York Times - report

NEW YORK (CNNMoney)

Outspoken New York real estate mogul Donald Trump has been holding meetings about possibly buying the New York Times Co., according to a report in New York Magazine.

Shares of the New York Times (NYT) were slightly lower in early trading, suggesting that investors were not taking the report all that seriously. Even the New York Magazine piece describes a purchase as "improbable."
The newspaper company has been hit by the financial problems that have dogged all of print media in recent years, amid the growing competition from the Internet. It has been losing money for a number of years. Most recently it posted a $43.7 million loss in the first nine months of last year. Its new New York City headquarters is heavily mortgaged and the company carries significant other debt. And while its shares rose nearly 16% in 2012 and are slightly higher so far in 2013, the stock has lost more than half its value over the last five years.
Related: The Trump brand, or just hype?
But the majority of the company's voting shares are controlled by the Sulzberger family, which has insisted on numerous occasions it has no interest in selling control of the company. And for the liberal Sulzberger family to sell to an outspoken conservative critic of both the Obama administration and the mainstream media seems particularly unlikely. The company declined to comment on the report.
Trump's office wouldn't comment specifically on the report, but it didn't rule out an attempt to buy the paper.
"I have watched Mr. Trump over the years navigate much tougher acquisitions," said Michael Cohen, who is special counsel to Trump. "Mr. Trump is so smart and so rich that if he wants it, he will get it. If Mr. Trump elects to purchase the New York Times, commits his time and resources, there is nothing he can't buy." To top of page

Algeria attack changes terror landscape in North Africa By Paul Cruickshank and Tim Lister, CNN updated 10:34 AM EST, Wed January 23, 2013

(CNN) -- It was the most ambitious and the deadliest terror attack since the rampage by Pakistani militants through Mumbai five years ago. And it raises the alarming prospect that al Qaeda affiliates and other jihadist outfits could turn parts of northern and western Africa into no-go zones -- places too dangerous for Westerners to work, or even visit.
The attack on the In Amenas gas facility left 37 foreign workers dead, according to the Algerian prime minister. It showed that al Qaeda-linked groups now have the resources to reconnoiter and launch complex attacks against places far from their strongholds, using a network of camps and intermediaries throughout the desert.
If their rhetoric is to be believed, their goals include targets farther afield -- leveraging sympathizers among the vast North and West African diaspora in Europe.
A spokesman for the man who orchestrated the attack, Moktar Belmoktar, told French media Monday that France would see "dozens like Mohamed Merah and Khaled Kelkal." Merah shot dead seven people in Toulouse, France, last year; Kelkal carried out a series of attacks in France in 1995.
Oil companies reassess risk
Algerian PM: 37 hostages killed
Algerian PM: 37 hostages killed
Algeria PM: Facility was booby-trapped
Family of slain hostage seeks answers
Obama's hostage crisis response
The most immediate concern to counterterrorism analysts is that Belmoktar will launch more attacks against Western companies in North Africa. A second attack on oil and gas infrastructure could cause foreign oil companies to reassess their exposure in Algeria, Libya and parts of West Africa, or at least raise the security costs of doing business in the region.
A former head of intelligence for the Transitional National Council in Libya, Rami El Obeidi, told CNN last week that with the French intervention in Mali, "a Pandora's box has been opened," and he believes oil fields in Libya are also at high risk of being attacked.
Geoff Porter, a longtime observer of events in North Africa, says a mass exodus of Western companies from Algeria is highly unlikely. But, he said, "the Algerian hydrocarbons sector will enter a holding pattern for the next month or so, possibly resuming meaningful activity at the beginning of March."
"Companies looking at potential opportunities in Algeria will now look not only at the available acreage's prospectivity, but also how its location impacts security concerns and associated costs," Porter added.
Belmoktar, the leader of a newly formed Saharan al Qaeda franchise that split from al Qaeda in the Islamic Magrheb (AQIM) last fall, remains at large, likely hunkering down in northern Mali, where he is believed to have amassed weapons and a war chest of millions of dollars from ransom payments and smuggling.
Belmoktar has been based in or near the town of Gao, where endless tracts of desert as well as cave complexes have been a safe-haven for a variety of militant groups affiliated with al Qaeda since armed Islamist rebels drove out government forces early last year.
Last month he announced the formation of a new commando unit called Those Who Sign with Blood.
"He has all the resources he needs in terms of money, weapons and soldiers to launch new attacks, and his recruitment and fundraising efforts will likely be boosted significantly because of the attack," said Noman Benotman, himself a former Libyan jihadist who is now a senior analyst at the Quilliam Foundation in London.
Complex attack
Belmoktar became known as "Mr Marlboro" because of his smuggling enterprises. But Robert Fowler, a Canadian diplomat who was held for 130 days after being taken hostage by Belmoktar in 2008, said he had no doubts about where Belmoktar's priorities lay.
"His men were amongst the least materialistic I ever encountered. His criminality always served the expansion of jihad," he told CNN.
According to Benotman and other sources, the leader of the Algerian attack was Taher Ben Cheneb, the Algerian head of The Movement of Islamic Youth in the South. In his 50s, Cheneb was a longtime associate of Belmoktar. Cheneb was supported by Abdul Rahman al Nigeri, from Niger, and another Algerian, Abou al Barra.
The unit Belmoktar dispatched was well-armed: heavy machine guns, assault rifles, rocket-propelled grenades, mortars and explosives were recovered from the scene. And eyewitness accounts suggested the group or supporters had undertaken advance surveillance because it was apparent the attackers were familiar with the sprawling facility.
U.S. officials and North African sources believe the attackers entered Algeria from Libya and that some may have been trained in jihadist camps in southern Libya, not far from the In Amenas gas facility. The sources tell CNN that Libyan authorities are aware of three jihadist camps south of Sabha providing instruction to militants from North Africa and the Sahara, but have lacked the capability or will to move against them.
According to one source, Belmoktar visited the commandant of one of these camps on a trip he made to Libya in late 2011.
Benotman says the first phase of the assault involved an attempt to hijack a bus carrying Westerners as it traveled to the local airport. This would have required advance knowledge of travel arrangements. Benotman told CNN that in the view of regional security officials, the attackers likely received some insider help -- they also knew which units at the facility housed foreign workers.
Algerian Prime Minister Abdelmalek Sellal said Monday insider knowledge was passed on by a Niger national who had previously worked as a driver at the facility.
"If there was an 'inside man,' then this has certain implications for due diligence and vetting of employees at other oil and gas sites," according to Geoff Porter, who runs North Africa Risk Consulting Inc.
The attackers' plan, according to Benotman, was likely to take hostages from the bus across the nearby border into Libya, although he said it is possible their final destination could have been another neighboring country, such as Mali.
But the intervention of Algerian forces prevented their escape. The second part of the plan appears to have been to threaten to kill the workers if the Algerians tried to storm the complex.
"If the attack was a genuine attempt to seize hostages, then this raises the likelihood that there will be another attempt at another facility," Porter said.
"The same implications apply if the goal was to destroy the facility. If, however, the attack was a 'spectacular' aimed at raising the profile of Moktar Belmoktar in the Sahara, which appears to be the most likely interpretation at this point, then the likelihood of it being repeated is lower," he added.
A jihadist spring
The attack on the Algerian compound involved fighters from across North Africa and the Sahara, according to Algerian authorities, including from Egypt, Mali, Niger, Mauritania, Tunisia and Algeria.
"Belmoktar's group in particular appears to have evolved -- they've been able to attract a more diverse group of foreign fighters than before, and that's a reflection of how other jihadists see them," said Andrew Lebovich, a Senegal-based security analyst.
Several other jihadist groups have also expanded, including factions of AQIM, a hotchpotch of jihadist militias in Libya, and the Nigerian militant groups Boko Haram and Ansaru. A variety of North African and Saharan jihadists and even some Nigerian militants appear to have received training in northern Mali, according to Lebovich, with different groups in the region "cross-fertilizing."
Sources monitoring the security situation in eastern Libya say that, if anything, it has worsened since the attack on the U.S. diplomatic compound in Benghazi in September, with a series of assassinations and attempted assassinations of security officials, many of which are blamed on Islamist militants.
Libyan authorities are aware of several jihadist camps providing instruction to Libyan militants and foreign fighters in the Derna and Benghazi region, but have not had the firepower to move against them. According to Western intelligence officials, a leading jihadist operating in the area is Abdulbasit Azuz, dispatched to Libya in 2011 by al Qaeda leader Ayman al-Zawahiri.
The Nigerian group Ansaru claimed responsibility for an attack that killed Nigerian troops heading to Mali on Sunday.
"We are warning the African countries to (stop) helping Western countries in fighting against Islam and Muslims or face the utmost difficulties," the group stated. Last year, White House counterterrorism advisor John Brennan warned that Ansaru was committed to transnational jihad.
Terrorism analysts believe that following the Algeria attack and the French military operation in Mali, these groups may be inspired to launch attacks against Western interests in the region.
"Fighting against local governments didn't help them. It didn't create the euphoria they needed. But now they have this foreign element: an invasion, the West, Crusaders giving them a sense of meaning and a cause in exactly the way Osama bin Laden envisioned," Benotman told CNN.
In recent days, Benotman said, hardline Salafist preachers across the Arab world have declared a call to arms against the French military intervention, depicting it as a foreign occupation.
Long-term challenge
Western governments are under no illusions regarding the challenges that lie ahead in the region.
"It will require a response that is about years, even decades, rather than months, and it requires a response that is patient, that is painstaking, that is tough, but also intelligent," British Prime Minister David Cameron said Sunday.
Although in the long term the Arab Spring may discredit al Qaeda's violent ideology, jihadist groups have taken advantage of political turmoil and the dismantling of security services in North Africa to build up their operations.
Over the past two years, al Qaeda has shifted its center of gravity from the Afghanistan-Pakistan border region where it is under pressure from drone strikes toward the Arab world, green-lighting the return of dozens of Arab operatives to their homelands, according to Western intelligence officials. The emergence of Syria as a new jihadist cause celebre has further energized militants.
In announcing the formation of the commando unit in December, Belmoktar had promised attacks on Western interests in the region and the home soil of Western countries if they moved against jihadists who had taken over northern Mali.
The fact that some of the attackers in Algeria were carrying Western identification -- two of them were reportedly Canadian -- will raise concern that the group could retask such recruits to launch attacks in the West.
Algerian Prime Minister Sellal said Monday a Canadian national known only as Chedad had played a coordinating role in the attack.
"French security officials have publicly said for some time that they are especially concerned that Westerners could come back from North Africa or the Sahel to launch attacks," Lebovich told CNN. The Sahel is the area along the southern edge of the Sahara.
So far, neither Belmoktar's group nor any other al Qaeda faction in North Africa has come close to launching a terrorist attack in Europe. Virtually all the AQIM cells dismantled in Europe were focused on logistics and fundraising rather than plotting terrorist attacks, according to European counterterrorism officials.
Confronting this emboldened transnational jihad in north Africa is a daunting task, complicated by several factors.
One is the long-standing lack of cooperation between North and West African countries. Algeria and Morocco, for example, are rivals for influence. Another is competing priorities among regional governments. Western diplomats tell CNN that Nigeria, for example, is more concerned about the threat from Boko Haram within than jihadist safe havens in Mali.
There is also the long experience of operating in the desert that leaders such as Belmoktar have, and the complex relationships between different and often fractious groups.
Another factor is that the United States has not developed the sort of intelligence infrastructure in this region that it painstakingly built up in the tribal areas of Pakistan and Yemen. In December, U.S. officials began discussing with Algeria the possibility that it might acquire its own satellite surveillance system to monitor terrorist movements in southern Algeria.
Analysts warn that however successful the first phase of the French operation in Mali, it is likely to encounter challenges similar to those faced by U.S. and British forces in Iraq as the campaign evolves.
"For months jihadists in Mali have been preparing for a military intervention by creating a network of hundreds of weapons caches and safe houses in the desert where they've stored weapons, ammunition, and food and set up communication channels," Benotman told CNN.
He said Belmoktar in particular may be hard to track down. "He's a survivor -- he knows when to go into hiding when necessary," he told CNN.
That's why French intelligence officials have dubbed him "The Uncatchable."